Easy Legal (tr. from Russian)

[pigmeich]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

For the truth of it, Legal is pretty easy science, even not the last, but a knowledge base. Lawyers (graduated or not) are also redundant.

It's out to just state, that, for example, if there's a murder and a man wearing a red hat went by — he is a killer. Punishment should be on him. Contrary, if a oppressed-slave-originated Black went by — he is clearly innocent.

The problem is where four went by the murder site: oppressed-slave-originated Black, Morocco Black, Sephardi Jew and Caucasian. All wearing red hats. Though I know, who will be guilty in the States.

The problem is solved by appointing dedicated persons — Judges. They somehow make judgement. Though, they have no affairs in containing the normal society, and it's problematic to set a duty. Because, then it's about to introduce the Evidence School, and, as we remember: lawyers are redundant.

From that, the judges make judgement taking bribes. But probably, they don't: comment your answer. There's another problem: the nation is unwilling to get through the courts by giving bribes. Because, it's pretty easy to find the red hat (you understand this is not the only criteria), and then being oppressed-slave-originated Black doesn't save you from the trial.

The problem is solved by introducing paid courts and praejudicialis. Maybe, the praejudicialis isn't introduced for that, I don't know. But the neat is: if there a trace of crime, then without sentence resolution the civil case will be left without remedy. And the police (the prosecutor) could easily deny the filing (at least in Russian Federation).

So, as you all see, Legal is very easy knowledge base and lawyers are redundant.